Although Europe, the Americas, and Japan still account for more than three-fourths of the market for luxury goods, the consumption of luxury goods is getting more and more a worldwide phenomenon. The rise of emerging countries further underpins the relevance of culture for managerial decisions including the pricing of goods. Prices for regular goods usually correspond to a product’s functional or tangible value. They work as a signal for quality and reduce consumers’ purchase risk. With high quality as a necessity for the perception as a luxury good, prices for luxury brands are primarily symbolic. High prices inhibit emulation and provide luxuries an exclusive image. They further work as a signal for personal wealth or the social rank consumers have or wish to have. While exclusivity corresponds mostly to consumers’ intrinsic needs (e. g., desire for uniqueness), the advertisement of personal wealth and social rank is rather tied to social values and consumers’ extrinsic needs (e. g., prestige and status). Both have value to the consumer: While feelings of exclusivity strengthen self-identity, status and prestige provide self-esteem.
Consumers’ needs and symbolic meanings are culturally bounded. Consequently, the ultimate value consumers derive from luxury fashion brands depends on the way consumers perceive their selves and on how well these brands fit their intrinsic and extrinsic needs. While previous research stresses cultural differences in purchase motives for luxury goods, this study addresses the role of culture for pricing luxury fashion brands.
This paper develops a conceptual framework that links consumers’ intrinsic and extrinsic needs to distinct cultural values. Following previous research, the authors find the pursuit of internal goals to be more important in individualistic countries. The display of personal success seems to be more relevant in masculine countries 2 and the usage of status symbols to prevail more in high power distant countries.
As luxuries’ symbolic value is grounded in their expensiveness, the authors hence suggest higher prices in countries that are more individualistic, masculine, and power distant. Hypotheses are tested by a large sample that covers retail net prices for more than 2,400 luxury fashion items from 15 product categories in five countries (France, Great Britain, Germany, Hong Kong, USA). Controlling for several product characteristics and country-specific effects, the authors find masculine values to have the biggest impact on luxury prices, followed by power distance and individualism. The low influence of individualistic values is explained by the fact that luxury fashion brands offer rather social gains (e. g., prestige and status) than individual gains (e. g. desire for uniqueness). Consequently, the satisfaction of intrinsic needs does not necessarily depend on the purchase of luxury brands.
As managerial application the authors recommend that practitioners should take cultural values into their considerations when pricing luxury fashion brands. Moreover, they suggest that existing pricing strategies should be reviewed based on the results of this study. The authors conclude with the limitations of their study and an avenue for further research.